Hawaii dog liability for owners of strong dogs

The dogbitelaw.com summary of Hawaii dog bite law quotes HRS 663-9: an owner or harborer is liable if the animal proximately causes personal or property damage, regardless of any lack of scienter. It also explains that in Hubbell v. Iseke a Hawaii appeals court held the section does not create strict liability and only means a negligence plaintiff need not prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous.

The same page quotes HRS 663-9.1, which excuses an owner for harm to a person who knowingly or intentionally entered the premises unlawfully, or harm caused by a dog that was teased or abused. It also says that breaking a leash law is evidence of negligence. The dogbitelaw.com negligence per se page adds that Hawaii juries are told a violation is evidence of negligence but does not prove it on its own.

The Governor's message on Act 224 (2024) says Act 224 was signed on July 8, 2024. The text adds a part to HRS chapter 711 that sets duties for owners of a dangerous dog, such as keeping it on a fixed leash no longer than four feet under an adult, within a fenced or walled area, muzzled when off the premises, and posting a warning sign. Check the current effective date and details with a Hawaii attorney.

Tell your insurer what dog is coming and read your lease or association rules first. State law does not override either.